Showing posts with label hysteria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hysteria. Show all posts

Tuesday, January 22, 2013

CDC confirmed flu cases show steep drop

Reported laboratory confirmed flu cases were down sharply for the most recent reporting period (ending Jan 12, 2013). 

CDC reported that out a total 12,360 specimens only 3,638 were positive for influenza (source FluView: http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/fluportaldashboard.html).

Breakdown:
A (H3)                                                   1,603
2009 H1N1                                              45
A (Subtyping not Performed)            1,355
B                                                              635

But, it is hard to know what to believe when it comes to reported numbers.    Numbers for weeks 51 and 52 of 2012 have been revised (up) since they were first released.  So, the numbers for the week ending Jan 12, 2013 may be revised in the future.  It is troubling why the numbers are being tinkered with.  CDC receives a certain number of specimens per week.   This number should not change.  But, it appears that CDC is releasing numbers before the final counts are in (thus lessening their usefulness). 
As previously reported on this blog, the hysteria surrounding flu this season appears to be overblown.  And now the hard numbers are bearing this out.


Monday, January 14, 2013

Calling BS on the Flu Hysteria for the week ending Jan 5, 2013

The Numbers Do Not Add Up
Who to believe, the CDC or the New York State Department of Health?
Last week, New York Governor Cuomo declared a public health emergency due to an outbreak of influenza.   But, the numbers just don’t add up.   The CDC has published numbers that show the new number of laboratory confirmed cases of flu nationwide totaled 4,222 (for week 1, 2013), down from a high of 5,108 for the last week of 2012. 
But, New York State is claiming that [laboratory-confirmed] “influenza was reported in all 57 counties plus New York City. There were 4,059 total reports, a 7% decrease over last week,”
 according to the weekly STATEWIDE INFLUENZA SURVEILLANCE REPORT, for the week ending January 5, 2013 (source:
http://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/communicable/influenza/surveillance/2012-2013/flu_report_current_week.pdf).

The numbers just do not add up.  New York State cannot account for nearly 100% of all flu cases nationally. 

Weekly confirmed flu cases reported to CDC (source FluView, http://gis.cdc.gov/grasp/fluview/fluportaldashboard.html).

YEAR      WEEK    number of confirmed cases
2012       40           162
2012       41           197
2012       42           299
2012       43           339
2012       44           408
2012       45           618
2012       46           841
2012       47           1328
2012       48           1995
2012       49           3366
2012       50           4449
2012       51           5417
2012       52           5108
2013       1              4222

TOTAL # , LAB CONFIRMED (NATIONALLY) CASES FOR THE SEASON:  28,749
TOTAL H3N2v FOR THE SEASON:  0



Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Coming soon: Flu Hysteria redux: H2N2. Calls for pre-vaccination for nonexistent threat

BBC reports that Dr. Gary Nabel and colleagues at the Vaccine Research Center (US) say that H2N2 poses a risk for a pandemic and that world governments should start a preemptive vaccine program now.

They suggest a worldwide vaccine program despite the fact that H2N2 does not currently pose a threat.

However, there was a major "oopsie" in 2004-2005, when "3,700 test kits of the 1957 H2N2 virus were accidentally spread around the world."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza_A_virus_subtype_H2N2

http://www2a.cdc.gov/HAN/ArchiveSys/ViewMsgV.asp?AlertNum=00229

The full BBC report is here:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-12691894



Excerpts:

"The US authors say immunity to the H2N2 flu strain is very low in people under the age of 50. But a safe vaccine already exists after an H2N2 outbreak in the 1950s and '60s. They say that vaccinating now could save billions of dollars if a pandemic does develop."

"Between 2003 and 2007 they examined levels of immunity to H2N2 among a small group of 90 people.

"Our study suggests that people under the age of 50 have little or no immunity, and resistance dramatically increases for those older than 50. This was also the case for the 2009 H1N1."

They argue that the vaccine developed in the 1950s would still work today and that governments should use this to develop a pre-emptive vaccination programme.

"One approach would be to manufacture the vaccine licensed in 1957 and immunise enough of the world's population to provide 'herd immunity' to the rest.

"This could be achieved by a 'one-time' campaign to immunise most of the adult population worldwide - for example, as part of standard seasonal flu vaccinations - accompanied by an ongoing programme to administer the vaccine to children."
Cheaper option

The authors say this would be a much cheaper option than stockpiling the vaccine or waiting for a pandemic to strike before boosting production.

"Another major influenza pandemic is likely to cost far more and create a much greater health burden than a well-planned pre-emptive programme.

"The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that a pandemic outbreak costs the United States between $71 billion and $167 billion."

Pretty amazing numbers being thrown around. Common sense seems to dictate that we spend millions now to save billions later. However, inquiring minds want to know which companies hold the patents for these vaccines? Somebody call Congress!

Thursday, March 3, 2011

British Members of Parliament react to swine flu hysteria created by Chief Medical Officer

Members of Parliament react to hysteria created by Chief Medical Officer

The House of Commons Science & Technology Committee (UK) released a report in which they questioned the methods with which the public was informed about the threat of the Swine Flu pandemic in 2009. The UK’s Chief Medical Officer held a press conference (on July 16, 2009) in which he suggested that up to 65,000 people in the UK could die during the pandemic.

According the to the report, “On 16 July 2009, the Chief Medical Officer, Sir Liam Donaldson, held a press briefing that led to media reports suggesting up to 65,000 people in the UK could die from swine flu in a worst case scenario. At that time, the number of actual deaths stood at around 30, and by the time the pandemic was over in April 2010, the total number of UK deaths was 460.

Dr Justin McCracken, Chief Executive of the Health Protection Agency (HPA), commented that: it shows how difficult communication is because it was not just the reasonable worst case scenario that was communicated to the press. It was, actually, the range of both the best and the worst. But, inevitably, I think the figure that the press focused on was the worst case scenario.”

Of course, the media ran with the report, and offered up scary headlines, which were echoed around the globe.

The committee’s recommendation:

“We recommend that there should be a single portal of information for every emergency, along the lines of flu.gov in the USA. This should be of use to members of the public as well as emergency responders and should be the primary source of all information, linking to other websites as necessary. We consider that maintaining this portal should be the responsibility of the Lead Government Department, and should be located within its departmental website.”

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmsctech/498/49808.htm#a24

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmsctech/498/49802.htm

Friday, February 25, 2011

Flu Vaccine Recommendations for UK, Germany, France, Spain, Italy

Flu Vaccine Recommendations for UK, Germany, France, Spain, Italy

Unlike the US, where the CDC recommends that nearly everyone over 6 months of age get the annual seasonal influenza shot, many other countries only recommend the shot (or, "the jab" as it is known in the UK) for person's aged 60 or older. In fact, most reserve the recommendation for people over 65 (with no underlying medical condition).

The US stands in sharp contrast, where the recommendation is that "everyone 6 months and older should get a flu vaccine each year starting with the 2010-2011 influenza season."
http://www.cdc.gov/media/pressrel/2010/r100224.htm

By contrast, the Europeans suggest that only those with underlying medical conditions (and not as many as in the US) and those over 65 get the shot.

It is not clear what the leading driver is for this disparity. It could be a number of factors, including; influence of the large pharmaceutical companies, legal structures (in the US vaccine makers shielded from civil liability), structural and political reasons, or, perhaps just hysteria.


Source: www.eurosurveillance.org

http://www.eurosurveillance.org/images/dynamic/EE/V15N44/MERECKIENE_Tab1.jpg

Tuesday, February 1, 2011

CDC reports flu activtiy is BELOW the epidemic threshold. Hallelujah!

The Centers for Disease Control, in a rare display of control are reporting that seasonal flu activity is below the epidemic threshold. http://www.cdc.gov/flu/weekly/index.htm

Of course, they still link pneumonia and flu together in their statistics, so we still don't have a "real" number of flu cases. But, this report confirms what many have long suspected: flu hysteria is just that: hysteria.